More on SOA and objects...
By : Steve Eichert - SOA | On : 2004 March 01
In response to my “Are object with behavior bad for SOA?” post Sebastien brings up a couple interesting points. He argues that the debate isn't worth having since you pass messages around in SOA not objects. Although in theory he's right, I'd argue that you are passing objects, they're just wrapped up in messages. Heck, the argument could even be made that the messages being passed are objects. Regardless I think whether he wanted to or not he validated my point. It absolutely doesn't matter if your...
|
|
|
Total:
![]() |
Click here to continue on details
Content Ownership
The content of this posting is wholly owned by Steve Eichert - SOA, and as such: the same retains sole copyright for the content. softlogger.com is not responsible for this content.
Recommended Related Readings :
Distributed Object-Oriented systems, SOA and Java?
I rarely read magazines or articles - I just skim them to see if there's anything I actually ...
SOA and the Elephant
I recently read a article by Bhaskar Chakrabarti from JP Morgan Chase who started his article ...
Indigo and SOA in San Francisco
Want to hear about SOA and/or Indigo? Eric Rudder, Don Box, Doug Purdy and Rich Turner are al...
SYSK 266: SOA Versioning Best Practices and on the Importance of Using Nullable Types and IExtensibleDataObject Interface in Data Contracts
“Interfaces are immutable…” Yes, we’ve heard that for years... The reality, however, is that...
SOA and Data
SOA and Data It has been about a year since I started my current job which is trying to ev...
SOA in the Unification Model
This is third in a series on the impact of the business operating model on Service Oriented Ar...
